Conflict & Cohesion 1

Plus Final Project Stuff

Jeremy Springman

University of Pennsylvania

Global Development: Intermediate Topics in Politics, Policy, and Data

PSCI 3200 - Spring 2024

Logistics

Assignments

  • Today
    • Think about Final Project
  • Tuesday (3/12)
    • Final Project Assignment 1

Agenda


  1. Finishing Conflict and Cohesion
  2. Final Project Assignment

Mousa (2020)

Why Study Cohesion?


What is social cohesion?

  • Patterns of cooperation among individuals from different social groups who live and work in close proximity

Why Study Cohesion?


Why do we want to increase cohesion?

  • Better governance
    • Adherence to norms and laws
  • Sustainable peace
    • Identity as a cleavage
    • Cooperation on peace agreements

Building social cohesion

What is the theory?

  • Social contact promots cohesion
    • Cooperation on shared goal
    • Social equality
    • Socially endorsed

What is the context?

  • Post-war Iraq
  • Rigid inter-ethnic cleavages

Intervention

What is the intervention?

  • Randomly assigning Christian teams to have three muslim players

What is the design?

  • Block randomization on baseline perceived commonality

Outcomes

Generalizability

  • On-the-field
  • Off-the-field

Domain

  • Behavioral
  • Attitudinal

Outcomes

Findings

Main findings

  • Improved behavior towards Muslim teammates
  • No improvement in generalizable behavior
  • No improvements in attitudes toward Muslims

Exploratory findings

  • Strong effects among successful teams
  • Improved generalizable behaviors across the league
  • Improved generalizable attitudes of exposed residents

Policy Implications


  • Contact works, but in a narrow way
    • We can improve people’s treatment of those they have contact with, but it doesn’t generalize
    • This necessarily limits the potential impact
  • We can reduce discrimination without attitude change
    • Creating personal ties can facilitate trade, negotiation, etc.

Grady et al. (2023)

How contact can promote societal change

Theory

  • Contact can create societal change through social diffusion

Mechanisms for diffusion

  • Changing norms
  • Knowledge of positive contact

Intervention

Grant program for conflict-affected villages

  • Mixed-group committees deciding on resource allocation
  • Mediation training
  • Forums to discuss conflict
  • Publicly visible cooperation

Design

  • Village-level random assignment

Outcomes

  • Contact
    • Self-reported contact
    • Contact willingness experiment
    • Observed behavior
  • Perceptions of security
  • Attitudes
    • Endorsement experiment
    • Self-reported attitudes
  • Cooperative behavioral game

Findings

Findings

Findings

Alternative Explanations


  • Placebo outcomes
  • Bundled treatment

Policy Implications

  • Contact interventions can have wider societal change and reduce the barriers to peace between conflicting groups
  • For social diffusion, contact must be highly public