The basics
Carolina Torreblanca
University of Pennsylvania
Global Development: Intermediate Topics in Politics, Policy, and Data
PSCI 3200 - Spring 2025
Not an easy question to answer!
One might even say polemic…
Etymology? Demokratia = demos + kratia
Is it about elections? About outcomes? About norms?
Academics often talk about minimalist (procedural)
and maximalist (substantive) conceptions of democracy.
Democracy as a PROCEDURE for choosing and replacing who rules us
Schumpeter: a system in which rulers are selected by competitive elections
Popper: a system in which citizens can replace governments without bloodshed
Przeworksi: a system in which citizens collectively decide by whom and, to some extent, how they will be governed
“Thick’’ definition of democracy
Democracy as system that embodies or a method for realizing extrinsic values
Democracies classified based on formal institutions and rules, how those institutions are used in practice, and what outcomes they produce
Common critique of procedural conceptions of democracy:
is that it is too thin and mostly electoral.
But is it really that minimal?
Common critique of maximalist perspective:
Democracy becomes subjective
If democracy is only justifiable for its outcomes, we may risk autocracy during bad times
What is a necessary condition for a system to be democratic?
Does it need to hold elections?
Does everyone need to be able to vote?
Does everyone need to be able to run for office?
Have an independent legislative body?
Independent media?
Economic equality?
Freedom house (0-100)
Per se
Instrumental (i.e gets you something else)
The best way to prevent abuse is by making our rulers dependent on us.
We can select the most competent rulers.
Pacification of the political life.
Economic Development
Then we want to keep it safe!
Democracies are stronger when citizens hold politicians accountable
But… what if people knowingly support antidemocratic governments or antidemocratic behavior from politicians?
Grossman, Kronick, Levendusky, and Meredith, 2022
Puzzle: voters often ignore or even support politicians’ power grabs. Why?
Extant research shows some people prefer nondemocratic governments (autocrats)
While others prioritize their partisan objectives over democratic principals (militants)
People who believe popular elected leaders are justified in taking legal but “antidemocratic” steps
What do we mean by that?
How to identify these people in the population?
Two survey experiments. We will focus on the first one
Vignette –> outgoing governor announces that he will appoint a replacement for a state SCJ instead of waiting for incoming governor from opposite party
Respondents are assigned to a treatment or control condition.
What is the treatment?
Randomly assigned whether the outgoing governor is a co-partisan of respondents
Outcomes?
Assumptions?
Are majoritarians antidemocratic? Are partisans?
What implications does the existence of majoritarians have for democratic quality?